O‘ZBEK VA INGLIZ TILLARIDA MUROJAAT SHAKLLARINING SOTSIOLINGVISTIK VA PRAGMATIK TADQIQI

Authors
  • Maftuna Abdiraim qizi To‘rayeva

    Author
Keywords:
murojaat shakllari, sotsiolingvistika, pragmatika, xushmuomalalik, qarindoshlik terminlari, T/V farqi.
Abstract

Maqolada o'zbek va ingliz tillaridagi murojaat shakllari sotsiolingvistik (yosh, jins, ijtimoiy mavqe, qarindoshlik) va pragmatik (hurmat, xushmuomalalik, «yuz» konsepsiyasi) jihatdan qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot Braun–Gilman va Braun–Levinson nazariyalariga tayanib, sifat tahlili metodida o'tkazildi. Natijalar o'zbek tilida qarindoshlik terminlari va hurmat qo'shimchalari, ingliz tilida esa ism va unvon tanlovi asosiy vosita ekanini ko'rsatdi. O'zbek murojaati ko'proq ijobiy, ingliz murojaati ko'proq salbiy xushmuomalalik strategiyasiga yo'naltirilgan. Xulosalar madaniyatlararo muloqot, til o'qitish va tarjima amaliyotida qo'llanishi mumkin.

References

1. Braun, F. (1988). Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

2. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

3. Brown, R., & Ford, M. (1961). Address in American English. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 375–385.

4. Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

5. Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics (pp. 213–250). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

6. Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

7. Shavkatovna, M. N. (2026). The impact of a leader's emotional intelligence on the management of an inclusive educational environment in preschool educational organizations. Arabian journal of science., 3(7), 350-353.

8. Мирюсупова, Н. Ш. (2019). Роль моделирования в развитии связной речи старших дошкольников на основе креативного подхода. Научные исследования, 34.

9. Shavkatovna, M. N. (2026). Psychological determinants of the demonstration of cognitive properties of leaders of preschool and school educational organizations. BG pulse journal, 2(07), 900-903.

10. Мирюсупова, Н. Ш. (2024). Мактабгача таълим ташкилоти раҳбарининг касбий фаолиятини ривожлантиришда билимларнинг ўрни. Science and innovation, 3(Special Issue 38), 311-313.

11. Shavkatovna, M. N. (2020). Pedagogical conditions as a means of forming creativity in future specialists of social and cultural activity. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 8(1).

12. Парманов, А. Э., Парманов, Ж. А., & Мирюсупова, Н. Ш. (2019). Интегративный подход к взаимодействию педагогов дошкольной образовательных учреждений с семьями воспитанников. In Наука и инновации-современные концепции (pp. 82-84).

13. Shavkatovna, M. (2025). Modern methods and models of strategic management of preschool educational organization. European international journal of pedagogics Учредители: European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 5(3), 49-51.

14. Botiraliyevna, A. M., Bohodirovna, S. D., Yoqubovich, N. H., Abdulhafizovna, M. Z. M., & Akbarovna, A. S. (2025). Methods Of Implementing Steam Educational Technologies In Primary Education. The Review of Diabetic Studies, 684-689.

15. Valieva, F. R. (2018). The importance of educational content in preparation of competative personnels. In 2 nd International Conference bridge to science: research works San Francisco, USA February (Vol. 28, pp. 121-122).

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-09-29
Section
Articles