DASTURLASHNI O‘QITISHDA AN’ANAVIY TEST TIZIMLARINING CHEKLOVLARI VA O‘QUV-BILISH KOMPETENTLIGINI BAHOLASH MUAMMOSI

Authors
  • Xurshidbek Komiljon o‘g‘li Xamrayev

    Author
Keywords:
dasturlashni o‘qitish, avtomatik baholash, test tizimlari, o‘quv-bilish kompetentligi, unit-test, metakognitiv ko‘nikmalar, mutatsion testlash, teskari aloqa.
Abstract

Mazkur maqolada dasturlashni o‘qitishda keng qo‘llaniladigan an’anaviy avtomatik baholash tizimlari (ACM Online Judge, Moodle quiz, unit-test asosidagi tekshiruvlar) ning pedagogik cheklovlari tahlil qilingan. 2017–2024 yillardagi avtomatlashtirilgan baholash bo‘yicha tizimli sharhlar tahliliga asoslanib, bunday tizimlar faqat kirish-chiqish natijalarini solishtirib, kodning mantiqiy tuzilishini tushunish chuqurligi, talaba yozgan testlarning xatolarni aniqlash qobiliyati, chegaraviy holatlarga tayyorlik va metakognitiv ko‘nikmalarni baholay olmasligi ko‘rsatilgan. Natijada o‘quv-bilish kompetentligini baholash muammosi yuzaga keladi. Maqolada bu muammoning yechimi sifatida talaba testlari sifatini o‘lchaydigan yondashuv — mutatsion testlash zarurati asoslanadi.

References

1. A Systematic Review on Assessment in Adaptive Learning: Theories, Algorithms and Techniques. (2024). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 15(7).

2. Garousi, V., Rainer, A., Lauvås, P., & Arcuri, A. (2020). Software-testing education: A systematic literature mapping. Journal of Systems and Software, 165. arXiv:2003.03843.

X.K.Xamrayev, D.V.Xamrayeva, & L.M.Zokirjonov (2023). QURILISH VA LOYIHALASH YO‘NALISHLARIDA MUSTAQIL TA’LIMNI TASHKIL ETISHDA SUN’IY INTELLEKT TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISHNI YO‘LGA QO‘YISH. Строительство и образование, 4 (5-6), 124-128.

3. Jia, Y., & Harman, M. (2011). An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 37(5), 649–678.

4. Keuning, H., Jeuring, J., & Heeren, B. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231711

5. Messer, M., Brown, N. C. C., Kölling, M., & Shi, M. (2024). Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636515

6. On the use of mutation analysis for evaluating student test suite quality. (2022). Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533767.3534217

Xamrayev X. K., Xamrayeva D. V., Zokirjonov L. M. QURILISH VA LOYIHALASH YO ‘NALISHLARIDA MUSTAQIL TA’LIMNI TASHKIL ETISHDA SUN’IY INTELLEKT TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISHNI YO ‘LGA QO ‘YISH //Строительство и образование. – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 5-6. – С. 124-128.

Cover Image
Downloads
Published
2026-06-15
Section
Articles